6.1 Customer Level

The group agreed that though position limits make most sense conceptually when imposed at the customer level, it is not practical to enforce such a requirement unless

  • The aggregate position of a customer who operates through several brokers can be determined by the use of a single customer code (for example the Income Tax permanent account number). Currently, each broker assigns a code to a customer independently so the customer has as many codes as the number of brokers through whom he operates.
  • A customer operating under multiple names and through multiple shell companies can be identified as a single customer using an operationalizable definition of "acting in concert".
Instead of recommending position limits at the client level, the group recommends a self-disclosure requirement similar to that in the take-over regulations:
  1. Any person or persons acting in concert who together own 15% or more of the open interest shall be required to report this fact to the exchange and failure to do so shall attract a penalty as laid down by the exchange / clearing corporation / SEBI.
  2. This requirement may not be monitored by the exchange on a real time basis, but if during any investigation or otherwise, any violation is proved, penalties can be levied.
  3. This would not mean a ban on large open positions but only a disclosure requirement.
[BACK]